Transportation

Vancouver, WA — Local leaders held a Transportation Solutions Town Hall Saturday at WSU Vancouver, which was organized by Washington State Representative, Liz Pike, to present solutions to the growing Portland/Southwest Washington metro traffic problems. During the 2+ hour session, Pike, along with engineers and architects, presented multiple proposals and listened to the concerns, ideas and feedback from Southwest Washington residents.

Pike organized the event to encourage “common sense solutions” to a problem that keeps getting worse. KOIN 6 News reports that “traffic volumes are up 300 percent from a year ago” as 80,000 commuters drive in from SW Washington to Portland each business day. Congestion is heavy along both Columbia River bridges (I-5 and I-205), as well as on I-5 southbound, I-84, I-405 and Highway 26 throughout Portland Metro.

The solutions panel was comprised of Pike, architect Kevin Peterson; local businessman Bill Wagner; bridge designer, Linda Figg; and transportation engineer, Dave Nelson, who presented various solutions and then responded to public feedback.

Transportation

The Transportation Solutions Panel. From left: Rep. Liz Pike, Kevin Peterson, Bill Wagner, Linda Figg, and Dave Nelson.

The panel presented the following proposed solutions:

  • New East County Bridge
  • New West Express Bridge/Tunnel — Five Phases
  • Practical Design Fly-over Near I-5
  • New Tunnel Below I-5 Corridor
  • Cascadia Commuter Express/Cascadia High Speed Rail and Multi-Modal Bridge over the Columbia River

This transportation solutions panel does not support a replacement for the Interstate Bridge following a multi-year $200 million study that resulted in zero results.

“A new I-5 bridge would not get us to Portland any faster,” said Wagner. “The whole CRC process resulted in wasting tax dollars on a study. And Clark County continues to reject light rail coming from Portland.”

Wagner said the panel does approve making seismic upgrades to the Interstate Bridge, and insists that replacing the bridge would be a waste of public resources.

New East County Bridge

This proposal comprises:

  • $800 million new Columbia River Bridge east of Glenn Jackson bridge.
  • Four new traffic 12′ lanes — two northbound, two southbound.
  • Wide safety shoulders.
  • Two 12′ multi-use protected pathways for bike and pedestrian experiences.
  • Long spans to accommodate river traffic.
  • Gradual grades for better truck speed and mobility.
  • Environmentally friendly bridge design with long open spans to touch lightly on the river.
  • 150-year lifespan.
Transportation

This is the concept for the new East County Bridge.

New West Express Bridge/Tunnel — Five Phases

West Express is an eight-lane limited access corridor with three express lanes in each direction, flanked by dedicated high-speed merge and exit lanes and features an elevated 20-mile bicycle and pedestrian path.

  • Phase 1A and 1B: Vancouver to West Portland.
  • Phase 2: West Portland to Beaverton/Hillsboro with tunnel under Forest Park.
  • Phase 3: New 19nd Ave Bridge to OR I-84.
  • Phase 4: Seismic retrofit of I-5 bridge.
  • Phase 5: Vancouver to I-5/north Clark County via Fruit Valley Road.

The project would alleviate traffic pressure from I-5 and I-205 routes.

Practical Design Fly-over Near I-5

This plan comprises:

  • $1.5 billion cost, four lanes each direction plus new SR 14 ramps.
  • 2.2 mile bypass of Marine Drive, Hayden Island, and the existing bridge.
  • Convert old bridge to local access, and replace in future with an at-grade local access bridge with lift span.
  • Move ship channel to center of Columbia River to avoid 95% lifts.
  • Victory Blvd. intersection to Mill Plain Blvd. with little new right-of-way acquisition required.
Transportation

Concept for I-5 Practical Design Flyover.

New Tunnel Below I-5 Corridor

The is a $4.5 billion project that spans 7.8 miles — from Leverich Park to the I-5/I-405 couplet, which adds two lanes north and two lanes south, offering massive freight mobility improvement, as well as improved commute times. The project would be privately designed, financed, built, owned, operated and maintained. It’s estimated completion time would be four years.

Cascadia Commuter Express/Cascadia High Speed Rail (CHSR) and Multi-Modal Bridge

This project would require $1.7 billion for a new multi-modal bridge, 1.2 mile tunnel and 11.3 miles of CHSR corridor with three auto interchanges. The multi-modal bridge is double decked west of the existing BNSF Freight Rail Bridge. The top deck has four lanes for vehicles, and the bottom deck has two tracks for freight trains, and two tracks for the Cascadia Commuter Express/CHSR.

The Cascadia Commuter Express corridor would run from the Rose Quarter Transportation Hub to a platform stop in West Vancouver and have a platform stop at 78th and Fruit Valley Road in Hazel Dell.

The 11.3 mile Cascade Commuter Express train would move 16,000 people per hour, and the trip time between Portland and Vancouver would take six minutes. This would be a private-public partnership.

Public Input

During the public input segment, Robert Schalk, who worked for the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) for nearly forty years, said “Most of what you drive in Portland I helped design.” Schalk’s opinions included the following:

  • No light rail to Clark County from Portland unless Clark County has its own light rail to test first.
  • Buses are more practical than light rail because they can spread out over more territory.
  • The traffic coming from Interstate Avenue and Marine Drive onto the I-5 bridge are too much for what the span was designed for.
  • The metro area needs both a new west side and east side crossings.

Julie Russell, who is running for Washougal City Council, said “People are opposed to tolling, and we need to hear their voices, and how do we get elected officials to understand that cars and new lanes aren’t evil?”

Roan Friar said he was intrigued by the fly-over design, but has concerns about funding. “I am also opposed to tolling,” he said. Others also inquired about the feasibility and speed of projects that are privately financed.

Figg said going the private funding route would still require environmental impact assessments, which would take about seven months. Privatized projects would be funded by investors who would toll passage to recoup their investment.

Richard Grill expressed his concern about working with Oregon. “They need to hear our side.”

What’s Next?

Pike encourages Clark County residents to “speak out for improvements to their infrastructure by rising up and making their voices heard.”

“Get in to see politicians, talk to them face to face, get to know people in Portland, and let them know what you think,” she added. “Rise up …”

Figg said: “It’s about communication and working with people in Portland for common sense approaches. Attend town halls, stay engaged.”

Lacamas Magazine will continue to discuss this topic and follow up with future town halls and progress. Public feedback and ideas are encouraged.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

5 replies
    • Douglas Green
      Douglas Green says:

      Identifying the problems – isn’t the problem. You have a job in a different state, a different city and a different county than your residence which means you have zero political standing over most of your commute. Oregon, Portland, Tigard and Multnomah county elected leaders have little political reason to fix your commute – you and our 60,000 trapped commuters aren’t who they answer to. In 1975 Portland cancelled the Mt Hood Fwy project and chose lightrail. Even the current proposed fix to the Moda Center tie up has garnered oppposition and has already brought on board one critical Portland city council member who could tie this critical improvement. Our challenge isn’t engineering. It’s politics. We need to convince Oregon political leaders and their voters that changes and improvements aren’t simply invitations to more sprawl that in a decade hence would see the same tie ups. Hint: scolding them, lecturing them, rending our clothes – emotionally good for us- not effective to date on them

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *